PUTTING OLD GRAND DAD IN THE TANK… Would you pay $22.50 for a quart 100-proof booze and then pour it into the tank of your gas guzzler?
That’s about what you could be doing when the country goes “ethanol.”
The process of producing a combustible liquid to replace gasoline in your vehicle is basically the same as making moonshine. Both concoctions come from cooking and fermenting a mixture of organic sugars and then distilling off the vapors, drop by drop.
The big difference is the size and scope of the process… while you might pay big bucks for something you drink in one-ounce glasses, are you willing to pay the same for something that you buy by the gallon?
THE ETHANOL SLIPPERY SLOPE… It appears each time the price of a gallon of gas goes up another 50 cents there’s more ink about building ethanol plants to replace our dependency on limited petroleum products with a “renewable” energy source.
As I understand it, as of today, making ethanol from plants is more expensive than importing oil and producing gasoline. Without subsidies to the makers and suppliers, the ethanol product coming out of the pump will cost more than the gasoline coming out of the pump across the way.
A major part of the problem is there are more costs to produce ethanol than what can be realized as profit at the end of the process. The major expense is buying the coal, oil, or electricity needed to drive the factory.
The other major cost is the raw material needed to make the ethanol.
Every story I’ve ever read on ethanol production reports the product can be made from any plant material, including weeds, saw grass and corn.
“CORN!” My English landlady exclaimed 40 years ago as I dished some on her plate. “We feed that to our pigs!” Not anymore, Fanny; it will be a long time before Porky gets corn for dinner.
Driven by demand and speculation, corn prices have skyrocketed across the world; driving food prices 30-40% up along with it. Fanny would be shocked to hear that nearly 90% of all prepared foods in the United States has some corn ingredient, most notably corn syrup.
Finally, our long-suffering grain farmers have a product to take to market by the trainload and take home a bushel of money. They deserve it.
You might think the plows would be slicing up the prairies to cash in on the windfall… actually, corn production is on the decline. There’s a market reality that product shortages drive prices up. Who can blame a farmer for growing less corn and getting paid more for it?
That’s just what happened in the 1970s ands ’80s when dairy farmers dumped the milk down the drain because prices were too low, at a $1 a gallon. When milk prices got up to $2 a gallon, the small family dairies were bought out by the big boys. Now milk is nearly $4 a gallon and the super farms are producing more milk than ever. But that’s another story.
So why pay more, now, to set up plants that will consume more energy than the energy they will produce? Why not design the plants to consume what we have the most of… garbage? Why not take the garbage, the plastic and any else that will burn; melt and/or ferment what is filling up the landfills and use that to create the fuel to keep the internal combustion engines running?
Smack dab in the middle of the tri-cities, right on Red Arrow Highway, an ethanol plant is slated to be built. The planning and public review process is just getting under way in Watervliet Township.
Goodness knows the area could use the jobs, taxes, and capital such a plant will bring.
I’m all for it; and I support the need for an ethanol product to replace gasoline for the fuel needed to drive our engines, the four-wheeled kind and the economic kind.
Perhaps sooner than later, gasoline will be more expensive than ethanol and all of this will make sense.
I’m just not sure the price tag to put corn-produced ethanol in the gas tank is something any of us can afford at this time, especially when it appears there are raw materials other than corn in abundance to make it.
kARL’S kOLUMN 4-17-08
